THE TABLE OF NATIONS:
GENESIS 10-11
Genesis Chapters 10 and 11 constitute what is known as "The
Table of Nations" in the Bible. The text is as follows,
These are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham,
and Japheth; sons were born to them after the flood. The sons
of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras.
The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah. The sons
of Javan: Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. From these
the coastland peoples spread. These are the sons of Japheth in
their lands, each with his own language, by their families, in
their nations.
"Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be
unto his brethren"
The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put, and Canaan. The sons of
Cush: Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, and Sabteca. The sons of
Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.
Cush became the father of Nimrod; he was the first on earth
to be a mighty man. He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; therefore
it is said, "Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the LORD."
The beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, and Accad, all
of them in the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria,
and built Nineveh, Rehobothir, Calah, and Resen between Nineveh
and Calah; that is the great city.
The latter paragraph is the subject of a separate
essay as all false religion in the world today can be traced
back to Nimrod, the founder of Babylon (in what is today Iraq).
Egypt became the father of Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim,
Pathrusim, Casluhim (whence came the Philistines), and Caphtorim.
Canaan became the father of Sidon his first-born, and Heth, and
the Jebusites, the Amorites, the Girgashites, the Hivites, the
Arkites, the Sinites, the Arvadites, the Zemarites, and the Hamathites.
Afterward the families of the Canaanites spread abroad. And the
territory of the Canaanites extended from Sidon, in the direction
of Gerar, as far as Gaza, and in the direction of Sodom, Gomorrah,
Admah, and Zeboiim, as far as Lasha.
These are the sons of Ham, by their families, their languages,
their lands, and their nations.
"Blessed be the LORD God of Shem, and Canaan shall
be his servant"
To Shem also, the father of all the children of Eber, the
elder brother of Japheth, children were born. The sons of Shem:
Elam, Asshur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram. The sons of Aram: Uz,
Hul, Gether, and Mash. Arpachshad became the father of Shelah;
and Shelah became the father of Eber. To Eber were born two sons:
the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days the earth was
divided, and his brother's name was Joktan. Joktan became the
father of Almodad, Sheleph, Hazarmaveth, Jerah, Hadoram, Uzal,
Diklah, Obal, Abimael, Sheba, Ophir, Havilah, and Jobab; all
these were the sons of Joktan. The territory in which they lived
extended from Mesha in the direction of Sephar to the hill country
of the east.
These are the sons of Shem, by their families, their languages,
their lands, and their nations. These are the families of the
sons of Noah, according to their genealogies, in their nations;
and from these the nations spread abroad on the earth after the
flood."
This information is tabulated below:
Genealogical Table of the Descendants of Noah
|
Noah |
|
Japheth |
Ham |
Shem |
Gomer
(Germany, Crimea, Cambria, Celts) |
| |
| |
Javan
(Ionians, Greeks) |
| |
| |
| |
Cush
(Ethiopia) |
Mizraim
(Egypt) |
| |
Canaan |
Elam |
| |
Arphaxad |
| |
Aram |
| | |
Magog
(Georgia, Scythians) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Phut
(Libya) |
| |
|
Asshur |
| |
Lud |
| |
| | |
|
Maidai
(Medes, Aryans, India) |
| |
Tubal
(Tobolsk) |
| |
| |
Nimrod
(Babylon, Ninevah) |
| |
|
Sidon |
|
| |
Salah |
| |
Hul |
Ashkenaz
(Germany, Saxons, Scandavia) |
|
|
Elishah
(Hellas) |
|
Meschech
(Moscow) |
| |
(Resen) |
Ludim |
|
Heth
(Hittites, Cathay) |
|
| |
| |
| |
Gether |
Riphath
(Carpathians) |
|
|
Tarshish
(Spain) |
|
|
Tiras
(Thrace, Teutons) |
Seba
(Meroe) |
Anamim |
|
Jebusite |
|
| |
Eber |
| |
Mash |
Togarmah
(Armenians) |
|
|
Kittim
(Cyprus) |
|
|
|
Havilah
(Arabia) |
Lehabim |
|
Amorite |
|
Peleg |
|
Joktan |
|
| |
|
|
Dodanim
(Rhodes) |
|
|
|
Sabtah
(Sabeans) |
Naphtuhim |
|
Gigashite |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sabtechah |
Pathrusim
(Pathros) |
|
Hivite |
|
Reu |
|
Almodad |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ramah
(Arabia) |
Cathtorum
(Crete) |
|
Arkite
(Phoenicians) |
|
| |
|
Sheleph |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Casluhim
(Philistines) |
|
Sinite
(Sino-, China) |
|
Serug |
|
Hazarmaveth |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheba |
| |
|
Arvadite |
|
| |
|
Jorah |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedan |
Philistim |
|
Temarite |
|
Terah |
|
Hadoram |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hamathite |
|
| |
|
Uzal |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abram |
|
Diklah |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obal |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abimael |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheba |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ophir |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jobab |
|
[Now the whole earth had one language and few words. And as
men migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of
Shinar and settled there. And they said to one another, 'Come,
let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.' And they had brick
for stone, and bitumen for mortar. Then they said, 'Come, let
us build ourselves a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens,
and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad
upon the face of the whole earth.' And the LORD came down to
see the city and the tower, which the sons of men had built.
And the LORD said, 'Behold, they are one people, and they have
all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they
will do; and nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible
for them. Come, let us go down, and there confuse their language,
that they may not understand one another's speech.' So the LORD
scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth,
and they left off building the city. Therefore its name was called
Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the
earth; and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the
face of all the earth.]
These are the descendants of Shem. When Shem was a hundred
years old, he became the father of Arpachshad two years after
the flood; and Shem lived after the birth of Arpachshad five
hundred years, and had other sons and daughters. When Arpachshad
had lived thirty-five years, he became the father of Shelah;
and Arpachshad lived after the birth of Shelah four hundred and
three years, and had other sons and daughters. When Shelah had
lived thirty years, he became the father of Eber; and Shelah
lived after the birth of Eber four hundred and three years, and
had other sons and daughters. When Eber had lived thirty-four
years, he became the father of Peleg; and Eber lived after the
birth of Peleg four hundred and thirty years, and had other sons
and daughters. When Peleg had lived thirty years, he became the
father of Reu; and Peleg lived after the birth of Reu two hundred
and nine years, and had other sons and daughters. When Reu had
lived thirty-two years, he became the father of Serug; and Reu
lived after the birth of Serug two hundred and seven years, and
had other sons and daughters. When Serug had lived thirty years,
he became the father of Nahor; and Serug lived after the birth
of Nahor two hundred years, and had other sons and daughters.
When Nahor had lived twenty-nine years, he became the father
of Terah; and Nahor lived after the birth of Terah a hundred
and nineteen years, and had other sons and daughters.
When Terah had lived seventy years, he became the father of
Abram, Nahor, and Haran. Now these are the descendants of Terah.
Terah was the father of Abram, Nahor, and Haran; and Haran was
the father of Lot. Haran died before his father Terah in the
land of his birth, in Ur of the Chaldeans. And Abram and Nahor
took wives; the name of Abram's wife was Sarai, and the name
of Nahor's wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran the father of
Milcah and Iscah. Now Sarai was barren; she had no child. Terah
took Abram his son and Lot the son of Haran, his grandson, and
Sarai his daughter-in-law, his son Abram's wife, and they went
forth together from Ur of the Chaldeans to go into the land of
Canaan; but when they came to Haran, they settled there. The
days of Terah were two hundred and five years; and Terah died
in Haran."
MARTIN LUTHER ON THE TABLE OF NATIONS
Whenever I read these names, I think of the wretched state
of the human race. Even though we have the most excellent gift
of reason, we are nevertheless so overwhelmed by misfortunes that
we are ignorant not only of our own origin and the lineal descent
of our ancestors but even of God Himself, our Creator. Look into
the historical accounts of all nations. If it were not for Moses
alone, what would you know about the origin of man?...
Of this wretched state, that is, of our awful blindness, we
are reminded by the passage before us, which gives us instruction
about things that are unknown to the whole world. What do we have
about the very best part of the second world besides words, not
to mention the first one, which antedated the Flood? The Greeks
wanted to have the account of their activities preserved, the
Romans likewise; but how insignificant this is in comparison with
the earlier times, concerning which Moses has drawn up a list
of names in this passage, not of deeds!
Hence one must consider this chapter of Genesis a mirror in
which to discern what we human beings are, namely, creatures so
marred by sin that we have no knowledge of our own origin, not
even of God Himself, our Creator, unless the Word of God reveals
these sparks of divine light to us from afar. Then what is more
futile than boasting of one's wisdom, riches, power, and other
things that pass away completely?
Therefore we have reason to regard the Holy Bible highly and
to consider it a most precious treasure. This very chapter, even
though it is considered full of dead words, has in it the thread
that is drawn from the first world to the middle and to the end
of all things. From Adam the promise concerning Christ is passed
on to Seth; from Seth to Noah; from Noah to Shem; and from Shem
to this Eber, from whom the Hebrew nation received its name as
the heir for whom the promise about the Christ was intended in
preference to all other peoples of the whole world. This knowledge
the Holy Scriptures reveal to us. Those who are without them live
in error, uncertainty, and boundless ungodliness; for they have
no knowledge about who they are and whence they came.
Martin Luther, Luther's Works, Vol. 2, pp. 207-209.
(Quoted by James Montgomery Boice in his commentary on Genesis,
Volume 1.)
Notes on Shem, Ham and Japheth by Ray C. Stedman
...this answers a very widespread distortion of this passage
that has been accepted for many, many years which says that the
curse fell on the Negro people. The mark of it was a black skin,
and therefore they are destined to be servants among mankind.
But the Canaanites, as far as we know, were not black-skinned
people. The curse was wholly fulfilled in Joshua's day when these
descendants of Canaan, morally perverted through this evil strain
which had survived the flood and now breaks out again in human
history, were left alive by Israel. Thus there was loosed in society
an evil element which has spread throughout the entire race since,
and breaks out in sexual perversions from place to place. This
is the biblical explanation for these things.
There is, however, a grain of truth in applying this passage
to the Negro people. Most powerful lies gain their power from
having at least a modicum of truth about them. It is true that
the colored peoples of the earth are descendants of Ham, Hamitic
people. They come in varying shades: the yellow of the Chinese,
the brown of the Indians, the black of the Africans, and even
including some that are white-skinned. Now we must turn to the
prophetic words uttered by Noah about his sons as to the destiny
of their descendants.
He also said [notice how he deliberately sets this apart from
what he said about Canaan], "Blessed by the Lord my God he
Shem; and let Canaan he his slave. God enlarge Japheth, and let
him dwell in the tents of Shem; and let Canaan he his slave..."
Here we have the three families of mankind. The family of Ham
is represented by Canaan, although not limited to his descendants.
In certain of the old versions, in these two verses referring
to Canaan, the account reads, "Ham, the father of Canaan,"
which is probably the more accurate rendering. Now this is a most
important passage. We can hardly overrate its importance in understanding
the world of our day...
Notice that Shem is given religious primacy among mankind.
The Semitic people, the descendants of Shem, were responsible
under God to meet the spiritual needs of mankind. That is their
role in humanity. It is most striking, isn't it, that the three
great religions of earth, which can properly be called religions,
all come from the Semitic family: Judaism, Mohammedanism, and
Christianity. There is much distortion of truth in these, granted,
but the sense of mission by the Semitic families of earth is very
evident. This family includes the Jews, the Arabs, certain ancient
peoples, as well as other modern groups.
Japheth was promised enlargement. The Japhethic people are,
in general, the peoples of India and Europe, the Indo-European
stock, with which any demographer is familiar. It is largely from
this family that we Americans come. It is most interesting that
history has recorded their geographical enlargement. The entire
Western hemisphere of our globe is settled by Japhethic peoples,
and the Indians (Hindus) are of the same stock. But there is much
to suggest in history that the enlargement that is promised here
to Japheth is also intellectual. Historically, all the great philosophers
are Japhethic. The Greeks, who began modern philosophy, are descendants
of Japheth, as we will see in the very next chapter, also the
Hindus. The Greeks and the Hindus are the two truly great philosophic
races of earth. Some of you may say, "Well, what about Confucius;
he was a Hamite?" But Confucius was not a philosopher; he
was a teacher of practical ethics. Anyone who studies him will
realize how true this is.
There is a very astute Christian scholar, whose writings are
privately distributed, who has been a great help to me in various
fields of Bible study. His name is Dr. Arthur Custance, from Toronto,
Ontario, to whom I am greatly indebted for some of these concepts.
He takes the phrase, "let him [Japheth] dwell in the tents
of Shem" as predictive of the Cross, when the spiritual guidance
of humanity passed from the Jews to the Gentiles, i.e., to the
Japhethic family. To Shem was given the primacy of religious teaching,
but there comes a time when Japheth enters that field ("dwells
in the tents of Shem"), and philosophy (which is essentially
Japhethic) was married to theology. This has been the case since
the dispersion of the Jews around the world.
There is much more we will say on this as we go on into chapter
10, but let me speak briefly about Ham. Ham is given the role
of a servant in relation to both of these other families of earth.
But, notice carefully, not a servant in the sense of enslavement.
That role was limited to the descendants of Canaan. "A slave
of slaves," is the Hebrew way of emphasizing, of intensifying
a statement. Canaan was to be that, but not the rest of the sons
of Ham. However, they were to fulfill a servant relationship,
not in the sense of enslavement, but as the practical technicians
of humanity. If you study ancient history and technological achievements
which were in many ways the equal of, or superior of, much that
we have today, were founded and carried to a high technological
proficiency by Hamitic people. This is the role in history given
by God to the descendants of Ham. The Egyptians, the Babylonians,
the Mayans, the Aztecs, all were Hamitic people. They were the
great inventors of mankind. It may come as a shock to some, who
boast in Aryan superiority and think of Americans as the most
inventive people on the earth, to know that almost every basic
invention can be traced to the Hamites, rather than to the Japhethites,
which we represent. All that Japhethic people do is to develop
the philosophy of science and apply technology, but the discovery
of these are largely traceable to the Hamitic peoples of the earth.
Now, to bring this introduction of the subject to a conclusion,
all of this is reflected most interestingly in the New Testament.
We have for instance, the so-called Synoptic gospels (Matthew,
Mark, and Luke), which are very similar to one another and quite
different from the gospel of John. Yet Matthew, Mark, and Luke
are not copies of one another but they represent differences of
approach. It has often been pointed out that they are aimed at
different types of people. The interesting thing is that when
you inquire who these people are you find that they are Shem,
Ham, and Japheth, in that order. Matthew is aimed at the Semitic
people. It is the gospel for the Jews, above all others. Mark
is clearly the gospel of the servant. This is stressed by Bible
teachers whenever they teach Mark; his gospel is profoundly the
presentation of the servant, the practical mind, the Hamitic mind.
Luke is clearly aimed at the Greek, or the Japhethic mind.
It is also interesting that three groups are recorded in the
New Testament as specifically coming to seek the Lord Jesus. They
are: the shepherds, the Wise men, and the Greeks. Here you have
again the order: Shem, Ham, and Japheth. The shepherds were Israelites,
Semitic. Most Bible scholars feel that the Magi, the Wise men
from the East, were really not from the East (that was a general
term) but from Arabia, and represent the Hamitic peoples. The
Greeks are clearly Japhethites. So there again, always in the
same order, we have Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Also, the gospel, was first preached in this order. In the
book of Acts we are told that on the day of Pentecost Peter stood
up and said, "Ye men of Israel," and addressed the gospel
to them. Then in the next section we find Philip called to leave
a revival in Samaria and go down to preach to a single individual
in the desert, who is a Hamite, an Ethiopian, the treasurer of
Ethiopia. Then, a little bit later on, Peter is sent to the Japhethites,
preaching the gospel to Cornelius, a centurion of Rome.
Furthermore, all three of these groups are represented at the
crucifixion. Each branch of mankind took part in the crucifixion.
The moral responsibility for it fell upon the Jews. It is they
who said, "His blood be upon us and. upon our children."
The physical burden of bearing the cross fell upon a Hamite, Simon
of Cyrene, a stranger in Jerusalem who was impressed into the
task of bearing the cross for our Lord on the Via Dolorosa, Finally,
as you know, executive responsibility for the crucifixion rested
with the Romans, who gave the official order for the death of
our Lord.
Now we shall see much more of this in chapter 10, but I think
this is enough to show how accurately the Bible previews history,
and how it deals realistically with these matters. There are often
hidden in trace them, carry us into vast and exciting fields of
discovery. we have looked at enough to confirm to us this fact:
that the race, the whole race, is but the individual written large.
There are three divisions of mankind, as there are three divisions
in man, in you. To each of these divisions is given the responsibility
for meeting one of the basic needs of man, spiritual, physical,
and intellectual. In each one of us these same three divisions
are found. We each have a capacity to worship; we each have a
capacity to reason; and each has a capacity to create. These are
the things that distinguish us from the animals. This is the image
of God in man. Each of them needs to be held in perfect balance.
The world is in a state of confusion, uncertainty and despair
because the balance God intended has been left unfulfilled, so,
in your individual life you are in a state of confusion, despair,
frustration, weakness, or whatever it may be, because you have
neglected to fulfill the three-fold capacities of your own nature.
You can only do so as they are kept in perfect harmony, one with
the other.
It is wrong to think of man as essentially spiritual. He is
also intellectual and physical. It is wrong to think of him as
being essentially physical, and to develop the athletic abilities
to the neglect of the others; he is also spiritual and intellectual.
The interesting thing is that in the Bible the intellectual is
put last. If the order of scripture obtains for the individual
as well as for the race, the order within us is also Shem, Ham,
and Japheth. First the spiritual, then the physical, then the
intellectual. In that order mankind finds its complete fulfillment.
If we understand ourselves we will also understand the world around
us. The glory of the gospel is that it addresses itself to mankind
exactly on those terms. We find ourselves entering into fulfillment,
into excitement, into a dramatic sense of being what we were intended
to be, when we open our lives to God through Jesus Christ, making
that our first priority; then developing the physical life, taking
care of physical needs, physical demands; and through these two
working together, developing the intellect to an understanding
of ourselves..."
Notes on the Table of Nations by Ray C. Stedman
Chapter 10 of Genesis is a record of how mankind fanned
out over all the earth, like spokes in a wheel, radiating from
a center which both science and Scripture place in the Middle
East. The Middle East has been called, "the cradle of civilization,"
or "the cradle of mankind." We are now dealing with
the days immediately following the Flood, when the sons of Noah
became the heads of three major divisions or families of mankind.
In this chapter we learn how they spread throughout the earth.
We have already studied the prophetic utterance of Noah concerning
the contribution his three sons and their descendants would make
to humanity.
We saw that to Shem was given the religious primacy of mankind.
The Semitic peoples are responsible, under God, to develop the
spiritual life of mankind. It is not surprising, therefore, that
from the Semitic peoples have come the three major religions of
earth: Judaism, Mohammedanism, and Christianity. To Ham was given
the art of technical proficiency. The Hamitic people are the technicians
of mankind, showing an amazing adaptability to the world in which
they live. To Japheth was given intellectual enlargement, and
the widest geographical distribution of the three families. History
has long since confirmed abundantly this distribution of mankind,
exactly as the Bible says...This is the kind of chapter that requires
careful and exhaustive study, but I shall merely attempt a quick
survey, pausing where Moses, the author of Genesis, also pauses
to make comment on certain names that appear in this section.
These are important comments and we need to understand why Scripture
suddenly turns the spotlight upon certain individuals.
The division begins with Japheth and his descendants,
These are the generations of the sons of
Noah, Shem, Ham and Japheth; sons were born to them after the
flood.
The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai,
Javan, Tubal, Meshech, and Tiras. The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz,
Riphath, and Togarmah. The sons of Javan: Elishah, Tarshish,
Kittim, and Dodanim. From these the coastland peoples spread.
These are the sons of Japheth in their lands, each with his own
language, by their families, in their nations. {Gen 10:1-5 RSV}
This division of the chapter, centering on Japheth, is the
shortest, yet to us in many ways it is the most important, because
it is to this family of mankind that most of us belong. We are
Japhethites and we find this of intense interest, although the
Scripture spends the least time with it.
Those who study races and peoples are known as ethnologists,
and one of the tools of ethnology is to trace the persistence
of names through history. Some of these place names and names
of individuals persist for a long time through the course of human
events, and form a kind of peg or nail upon which we can hang
certain important movements in history and by which we can trace
certain developments. We can do this with many of the names in
this passage. Letters may be transposed, endings added, prefixes
taken away or added, but there is a basic root which persists
for years and even centuries of the time, and these give us a
way of tracing the spread of the peoples of earth.
The family of Japheth is essentially what we call the Aryans.
Hitler made much of the Aryan race, claiming that the Germans
were pure Aryans and the rest were mongrels. Of course, the Jews
were of a completely different family. He was right about that,
for the Jews are Semitic (from Shem) while the Aryans are from
Japheth. But where Hitler made his mistake (and where many people
today make a mistake) is to fail to differentiate between differences
which exist between people and a supposed superiority. Because
people are different is no sign that they are inferior or superior.
This is one of the basic things we need to understand in studying
the peoples of the earth.
Early in the history of the world, the Japhethites, or Aryans,
split into two groups. One group settled in India and the other
group in Europe. Together they form what is known as the "Indo-European"
family of nations. Any ethnographer is familiar with these divisions,
but they are the same basic stock. The next time you visit India
you should realize that you are visiting your cousins in the same
basic family. The interesting thing is that both of these divisions,
the Indian and the European, trace their ancestry back to Japheth.
This is not from the Bible, but from history:
The Greeks say that their ancestor was a man named Japetos,
and you can see in that the resemblance to Japheth. They regarded
him as not only the father of their race, but the father of all
humanity. The Indians, on the other hand, have an account of the
flood similar in many respects to the Biblical account. The name
of their hero is not Noah, but Satyaurata, and he had three sons.
The name of the oldest was Iyapeti (you can see Japheth in that,
very easily), and the other two were Sharma, and C'harma (Shem
and Ham). The interesting thing about the Indian account is that
C'harma was cursed by his father because he laughed at him when
he got drunk, a certain echo of the story we have in Genesis.
You see from this how this chapter is embedded in history.
The Word of God is dealing with realistic matters when it traces
these divisions.
We learn here that Japheth had seven sons, but only two of
them are traced for us in any detail: The first son was Gomer.
From this word, Gomer, by a process of elision and transposition
of letters, there came the word, Gaul, or Gallic. These are the
people, interestingly enough, to whom the New Testament Epistle
to the Galatians is written. The Galatians were Gauls. Most of
us have a Gallic or Celtic (or Keltic) ancestry, and the Gauls
and Celts (or Kelts) were descendants of Gomer. They migrated
to the north and settled in Spain, France and in Britain. From
these Gauls come most of the early families of Western Europe
and, consequently, of the Americas as well.
The oldest son of Gomer was Ashkenaz. He and his descendants
first settled around the Black Sea and then moved north into a
land which is called Ascenia, and which later became known as
the Islands of Scandia, which we now know as Scandinavia. You
can trace a direct link between Ashkenaz and Scandinavia. Another
of the sons of Gomer was Riphath. Although we do not know too
much about Riphath, we do know that he located in Central Europe,
and some scholars feel that the word, Europe, itself comes from
this name, Riphath. Another son is Togarmah. This name is easily
traced. He was the ancestor of the present-day Turks and Armenians,
who also migrated northward into Southern Germany. Certain scholars
have felt that the word, Germany, derives from the word, Togarmah.
If you drop the first syllable you have the basic root of Germany.
Two others of the sons of Japheth were Madai and Javan. These
are easily recognizable in history: The Madai became the Medes,
of the famous Medes and Persian Empire. Javan is unquestionably
the ancestor of the Greeks. His name, Javan, is still found in
Greece in the form of Ionia. The Ionic Sea and Ionian Peninsula
all derive from this word Javan. His sons were Elishah,
from which we get the Greek word, Helles (the Greeks are still
called Hellenes), and Tarshish, whom most scholars associate
with Spain; Kittim, which is the Island of Cyprus; and Dodanim,
who settled around the Black Sea, and still finds a modern parallel
in the word, the Dardanelles. These can all be traced by the geographical
titles and place names they left behind.
Next is the family of Ham, which is the family gifted
with technical proficiency. Because of the great adaptability
of these people to primitive conditions, the Hamites became the
great pioneers of mankind. All the early civilizations were Hamitic:
the Egyptians, the Babylonians, the Mayans, the Aztecs, the Sumerians.
These were the people most able to adapt themselves to the conditions
they found wherever they settled. We owe a great deal to the Hamitic
nations. Later on, these lands were occupied by Japhethic nations,
and at the present day the entire Western hemisphere is peopled
by Japhethic rather than Hamitic nations, though it was once the
other way around.
We shall take the family of Ham in two sections, briefly commenting
on certain items:
The sons of Ham: Cush, Egypt, Put, and
Canaan. The sons of Cush: Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah, and
Sabteca. The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan. Cush became the
father of Nimrod; he was the first on earth to be a mighty man.
He was a mighty hunter before the LORD; therefore it is said,
"Like Nimrod a mighty hunter before the Lord." The
beginning of his kingdom was Babel, Erech, and Accad, all of
them in the land of Shinar. From that land he went into Assyria,
and built Nineveh, RehobothIr, Calah, and Resen between Nineveh
and Calah; that is the great city. Egypt became the father of
Ludim, Anamim, Lehabim, Naphtuhim, Pathrusim, Casluhim (whence
came the Philistines), and Caphtorim. {Gen 10:6-14 RSV}
The four sons of Ham are relatively easy to trace in history:
Cush is associated with the peoples of Southern Arabia and Ethiopia.
Ethiopians still trace their ancestry back to Cush. Egypt is self
explanatory. Egypt (or Mizraim in Hebrew, an ancient name
for Egypt) became the father of the Egyptian Empire, settling
in the Nile Valley. Put is associated with Lydia, on the west
of Egypt, in North Africa. Canaan centered largely in and around
Palestine, though the Canaanites later became much more widespread,
as this account tells us further on.
The account zooms in on an individual named Nimrod, who is
called a great hunter. He is a rather mysterious figure, of great
importance in ancient history. He is the founder, as we are told,
of both Babylon and Nineveh, the two great cities of antiquity
which ultimately became enemies of Israel. The prominent thing
said about him here is that he was a mighty man, "a mighty
hunter before the LORD." Now it was the work of kings in
those ancient days to be hunters. This was a time when civilization
was sparse and wild animals were a constant threat to the peoples.
Kings, having nothing much else to do, organized hunting parties
and acted as the protectors of their people by killing wild animals.
Nimrod evidently gained a great reputation as such a hunter, but
he was more than a hunter of wild animals. The Jewish Talmud helps
us here, for it says that he was "a hunter of the souls of
men." By the founding of Babylon and Nineveh we have a hint
given of the nature of this man. We are told here that he was
"the first mighty man on earth," i.e., after the Flood.
That phrase, "mighty man," takes us back to Genesis 6
where, in that strange story of the invasion of the "sons
of God" into the human race, there resulted a race of giants
called Nephilim. We are told that, "these were the mighty
men that were of old, the men of renown." This was evidently
a demonic invasion of the race, with sexual overtones, which brought
into being a race of giants that were morally degraded. These
also appear later on in the Canaanite tribes. We have found this
suggestive line of thought running through the Scriptural account
up to this point. It now suggests that Nimrod was one of these
"mighty men," and therefore introduced a perverted,
degraded form of religion into the world. It began at Babylon,
spread to Nineveh, and can be traced in history as it subsequently
spread throughout the whole of the earth. Thus, in this man Nimrod,
we have the seed of idolatry and false religion coming in again
after the Flood.
If you drop the first consonant of Nimrod's name and take the
others -- M, R, D -- you will have the basic root of the god of
Babylon, whose name was Marduk, and whom most scholars identify
with Nimrod. In the Babylonian religion, Nimrod (or Marduk) held
a unique place. His wife was Semiramis. (Some of you who have
been at Cairo have stayed at the Semiramis Hotel, which is named
after her.) Marduk and Semiramis were the ancient god and goddess
of Babylon. They had a son whom Semiramis claimed was virgin-born,
and they founded the mother and child cult. This was the central
character of the religion of ancient Babylon, the worship of a
mother and child, supposedly virgin born. You can see in this
a clever attempt on the part of Satan to anticipate the genuine
virgin birth and thus to cast disrepute upon the story when the
Lord Jesus would later be born into history. This has been the
effect of it.
This ancient Babylonian cult of the mother and child spread
to other parts of the earth. You will find it in the Egyptian
religion as Isis and Osiris. In Greece it is Venue and Adonis
and in Hindu it is Ushas and Vishnu. The same cult prevails in
various other localities. It appears in the Old Testament in Jeremiah,
where the Israelites are warned against offering sacrifices to
"the Queen of Heaven." This Queen of Heaven is Semiramis,
the wife of Nimrod, the original mother of the mother and child
cult. The cult has also crept into Christianity and forms the
basis for the Mariolatry that has prevailed in Roman Catholic
Church, where the Mother and Child are worshipped as joint redeemers.
If you would like to read more on this, there is a book by
Alexander Hislop, a very authoritative writer in this field, called
The Two Babylons. I am sure you will find it of great interest
if you desire to pursue this further.
This idolatrous religion culminates at last in the Bible in
the book of Revelation. You remember the "great harlot"
that appears there whose name is "Mystery Babylon the Great,"
the originator of all the harlotries and false religions of earth.
The essence of Babylonianism, as we understand from Scripture,
is the attempt to gain earthly honor by means of religious authority.
That is Babylonianism, and it has pervaded Christian churches,
Hindu temples, Buddhist shrines, and Mohammedan mosques. Everywhere
it is the element that marks falseness in religion, this attempt
to gain earthly power and prestige by means of religious authority.
That is Babylonianism. That is what Nimrod began and what God
will ultimately destroy, as we read in the book of Revelation.
The land of Shinar, mentioned here, is also the land of Shunar
or Shumar, from which we get the word, Sumeria, and the Sumerian
civilization, with which scholars are familiar. The city of Resen
was founded by people who later migrated into the north of Italy
and began the great Etruscan Empire, which again is familiar to
any who study ancient history. We also have here the countries
that came from Egypt and are associated with it here, all of which
are countries of North Africa.
One further note on this section: Note that the Philistines,
which appear frequently elsewhere in the Old Testament, are linked
with the Egyptians. This is significant, for Egypt in the Bible
is always a picture of the world; the Philistines are a picture
of the flesh in its religious aspect, religious flesh or Pharisaism,
if you like. These are forever typified by these two nations.
The second section of the sons of Ham centers on the descendants
of Canaan,
Canaan became the father of Sidon his first-born,
and Heth, and the Jebusites, the Amorites, the Girgashites, the
Hivites, the Arkites, the Sinites, the Arvadites, the Zemarites,
and the Hamathites. Afterward the families of the Canaanites
spread abroad. And the territory of the Canaanites extended from
Sidon, Gomorrah, Admah, and Zeboiim, as far as Lasha. These are
the cons of Ham, by their families, their languages, their lands,
and their nations. {Gen 10:15-20 RSV}
In a previous message we saw that these constituted the Canaanite
tribes which occupied the land of Palestine at the time of Abraham.
They were a morally degraded people, and were that as a result
of demonic invasion. That does not mean that every individual
was demonically possessed, but there was considerable experience
of this among these people. We must note certain individuals in
this listing, but not all:
Sidon is mentioned as the first-born of Canaan. He founded
the city by the same name, located near Tyre, on the coast of
Phoenicia. Since there is no mention of Tyre here we can see how
early this account is. Heth is the father of the Hittite nation.
The Hittites were once regarded by archaeologists as a biblical
blunder. Archaeologists said the Bible was absolutely wrong when
it mentioned the Hittites, for there was no such people. But since
that time, Hittite relics have been discovered in abundance, and
scholars are now well aware of the great civilization that flourished
under the Hittites. The Hebrew form of this word, Hittite, is
Khettai and from this comes the word Cathay, which
many of you will recognize as an ancient name for China. Certain
of the Hittites migrated eastward and settled in China. Also,
another name in this list, the Sinites, is linked with China.
It derives from a presumed son of Canaan whose name was Sin. The
Sinites migrated eastward until they came into Western China,
where they founded the ancient Empire of China and gave their
name to the land. There is a direct connection between the word
China and the word Sinim, the biblical name for
China. (I remember reading as a boy of the Sino-Japanese War,
showing how the ancient name still persists.) They pushed eastward
and toward the north over the land bridge into Alaska. The Sinites
are the people who settled the Americas in prehistoric days and
became the ancestors of the Eskimos and Indians who, to this very
day, betray their Mongoloid ancestry.
Now the third family that is traced here is Shem:
To Shem also, the father of all the children
of Eber, the elder bother of Japheth, children were born. The
sons of Shem: Elam Asshur, Arpachshad, Lud, and Aram. The sons
of Aram: Uz, Hul, Gether, and Mash. Arpachshad became the father
of Shelah; and Shelah became the father of Eber. To Eber was
born two sons: the name of the one was Peleg, for in his days
the earth was divided, and his brother's name was Joktan. Joktan
became the father of Almodad, Sheleph, Hazarmaveth, Jerah, Hadoram,
Uzal, Diklah, Obal, Abimael, Sheba, Ophir, Havilah, and Jobah;
all these were the sons of Joktan. The territory in which they
lived extended from Mesha in the direction of Sephar to the hill
country of the east. These are the sons of Shem, by their families,
their languages, their lands, and their nations.
These are the families of the sons of Noah,
according to their genealogies, in their nations; and from these
the nations spread abroad on the earth after the flood. {Gen
10:21-32 RSV}
The noteworthy thing said here is that:
Shem was the father of the children of Eber. Actually, Eber
was a great-grandson of Shem, but from Eber comes the word Hebrew.
Abraham, who was really the founder of the Hebrew nation, was
six generations beyond Eber. Yet Eber is of such note that Abraham
is identified as an Eberite, or Hebrew.
Elam, the next son of Shem, is associated with Southern Mesopotamia.
Archaeologists have now found that the earliest inhabitants of
this area were Semites, not Hamites, as they once thought. Asshur
is the one who gave his name to Assyria. The genealogy closes
with Eber's two sons, Peleg and Joktan.
The tribes listed as from Joktan are all associated with Arabia.
The boundaries of Mesha and Sephar given here are both within
the Arabian Peninsula. Our main interest, however, centers on
Peleg and this cryptic comment made about him, "in his days
the earth was divided." What do you think that means?
Peleg in Hebrew, means "Division," but in Greek
it means "Sea." We get our present English word archipelago
from this: archi-pelagos, the first sea. The Greeks called
the Aegean Sea "The Archipelago," the first sea, drawing
the name from this man, Peleg.
There is some evidence to link this with the scientific theory
of continental drift; the idea that once the continents were bound
together in one great land mass, but sometime in the past they
separated and began to drift apart until the Americas came to
their present location, Australia slid down into the south, Antarctica
still further south, and the continents assumed the present distribution
of land mass on the earth. Some have suggested that this may have
occurred as late as the days of Peleg, immediately following the
Flood. Perhaps the great rift valleys of Africa and Asia had not
yet formed, and, in Peleg's day, these drew apart so that the
seas broke into this inner world and formed the Red Sea, the Mediterranean
Sea, and the Dead Sea. This would be the formation of the first
sea, from which we get the word archipelago.
There are many geologists, of course, who would raise questions
about this, for they would say this is far too late in history
for anything like that to have occurred. The account here is much
too brief for us to be dogmatic about this, but it is very suggestive.
If this were the case, it may well have been that the American
continent was still in view of Europe and Asia in those days,
and that as it moved westward gradually disappeared from the horizon.
This gave rise to the many myths and stories about a lost continent
called Atlantis which disappeared beneath the Atlantic. There
are many interesting threads here that we would love to follow.
Now we must come to the explanation of the title I have chosen
for this sermon, God's Funnel. A funnel is an instrument
or device for narrowing a flow of liquid or powder from a wide
expanse to a narrow one. That is what God is doing here in Genesis 10.
Shem is put last of the sons of Noah because God is narrowing
the flow of sacred history down to the Semitic races. Shem is
the neck of the funnel. God is restricting the stream of humanity
that he will deal with personally and directly down to one family
group, the family of Shem. In Chapter 11, Verse 10 on
to the end of the chapter, he takes this up again and narrows
it still further to one man, Abraham. From there it begins to
broaden out again to take in Abraham and all his descendants,
both physical and spiritual. The rest of the Bible is all about
the children of Abraham, physically and spiritually. Here we have
then one of the most important links in understanding the Bible.
Why does God do this? He has been accused of showing favoritism
in picking the people of Israel for his link with humanity. But
it is not that. God is no respecter of persons, as we are told.
He does this because it is necessary in view of the limitations
of our minds, not of his. No one man can grasp the whole widespread,
varied, world of mankind. We cannot do so even today. At election
time we take polls to determine what people are thinking, because
we cannot grasp or assimilate in any way what the entire mass
of a people are thinking. We must take polls, samples. God is
doing this with Israel. Israel becomes the sample nation, the
sample people. Through the rest of the Bible, whatever is true
of Israel is true of everyone; their story is our story -- your
story and my story. Their stubborn rebellion is the same rebellion
that we display, and their spiritual blessing under God is the
same kind that we can expect if we open ourselves to respond to
the grace of God. One fact comes drumming through all this otherwise
dry genealogy: that is that God is seeking somehow to break through
into our hearts and wills. He presses upon us in great historic
sweeps and in the minor incidents that happen to each of us.
The great question we must raise in a service like this is:
Are you listening? Are you getting the message God wants you to
get?
He writes it large upon the landscape of history, and also
he writes it small in the incidents of your daily life. But in
every case it is the same truth pressing through to us. God is
essential to us. We cannot live without God. You cannot fulfill
yourself, you cannot find yourself without him. He loves you,
is seeking you, wants you, and is drawing you to himself. Forever
this finds its confirmation in all of life around us. --from Ray
C. Stedman, The
Beginnings.
Notes on the Sons of Noah by Henry M. Morris
...Finally, it was the sin of Ham (not Canaan) that had served
as the occasion for his father's curse, and it would have been
inappropriate for Noah thus to single out only one of Ham's four
sons as bearing the burden of the curse. Therefore, it seems necessary
to understand this as a Hamitic, rather than Canaanitic, curse,
with Canaan mentioned specifically in order to stress that the
terms of the prophecy extended to all of Ham's sons, even his
youngest. In the context of the immediate situation, it may also
have been a reaction to Noah's hurt; that is, as Noah's youngest
son had brought grief to his own heart, so he especially singled
out Ham's youngest son in his prophecy. [I do not agree with Dr.
Morris on this interpretation, L.T. Dolphin]
Assuming, however, that the curse did apply to the Hamitic
peoples in general, what was its meaning and how has it been fulfilled?
"A servant of servants shall he be to his brethren"
can hardly mean "a slave of slaves," because such a
situation has never occurred among the descendants of any of Ham's
four sons, including Canaan. The descendants of Ham included the
Sumerians, the Egyptians, the Ethiopians, and other great nations
of the past; and there is a good possibility they include some
of the great Asiatic nations of the present as well.
Unfortunately, there have been some interpreters who have applied
the Hamitic curse specifically to the Negro peoples, using it
to justify keeping the black man in economic servitude or even
slavery. It is obvious, however, that the prophecy applies not
only to black Africans but also to all other descendants of Ham
(most of whom are not blacks), and no more of the Hamitic peoples
have experienced such servitude during their history than the
non-Hamitic peoples.
If "servant of servants" does not mean "lowest
slave," then what does it mean? Although the word "servant"
is used frequently in the Old Testament, this is the only place
where "servant of servants" occurs. In the next two
verses, Noah predicted that Canaan would be both "servant"
to Shem and "servant" to Japheth. In other words, the
nations descended from Ham would be servants not only to one other
nation or one other group of nations, but to all other nations.
This unique and worldwide "service" is probably in part
what is meant by the superlative "servant of servants."
It might be objected, however, that the Hamitic nations have
never been under worldwide subjugation to the Japhethic and Semitic
nations (neither, for that matter, have the Canaanites alone).
In answer to this objection, it may be noted that a servant is
not necessarily a slave. In fact, the word is used much more often
to refer to one who has the position of "steward," a
very honorable position in a household, rather than to one who
is a slave.
This, in fact, is the first mention of the word "servant"
in the Bible and, as such, undoubtedly has special significance.
In a sense, it may be prophetic of Christ, who was in the fullest
degree made to be a servant of servants for all the world, bearing
the curse for us (Philippians 2:6-8; Galatians 3:10, 13).
There is one other possibility, which does seem to fit all
the facts of the case. If "servant" in this case means
"steward," then the prediction becomes one of material
service to mankind. Man in general is God's steward over the physical
world and its processes, as well as its living creatures. Because
of man's sin, the ground had already come under God's "curse"
(Genesis 3:17); and man was from then on to develop and utilize
its resources for the sustenance of life "in the sweat of
his face." However, man still had the responsibility of subduing
and exercising dominion over the earth and its creatures (Genesis
1:28; Psalm 8:6-9), a responsibility which demanded first of all
that he seek to understand his dominion. This would require intellectual
effort, research, knowledge, and everything that is involved in
the term "science," as well as "philosophy."
The greatest of man's responsibilities, however, was to fill
the earth, not only with physical descendants (Genesis 1:28; 9:1)
but "with the knowledge of the Lord" (Isaiah 11:9; Habakkuk
2:14). He was to teach men to "call upon the name of the
Lord" (Genesis 4:26), preserving and transmitting the promises
of God until the coming of the world's Redeemer.
Mankind thus had three fundamental types of duties to perform
as God's steward over the world: (1) spiritual receiving, preserving,
and teaching the knowledge of the word of God; (2) intellectual
expanding and teaching the knowledge of the world of God; and
(3) physical providing the material means for man's bodily needs
and comforts, thus enabling him to fulfill his intellectual and
spiritual functions more effectively. These three duties correspond,
in fact, to the tripartite nature of man: spirit, soul, and body.
Every person has, to some degree, all three capacities, but
in each person one usually dominates. That is, some people are
dominated by physical considerations, some by intellectual, some
by spiritual. The same generalization applies to nations: some
have historically been primarily motivated by religious considerations,
some by philosophical and scientific thinking, others by materialistic
(or so-called practical) pursuits.
It is therefore very significant that these first three progenitors
of all modern nations were recognized by their father to have
characteristics representing these three emphases. Shem was mainly
motivated by spiritual considerations, Japheth by intellectual,
and Ham by physical; and the same would be true (in a very general
way, of course) of the nations descending from them, by reasons
of both genetic inheritance and parental example.
Each was regarded as God's servant Shem in spiritual service
and Japheth in intellectual service. Ham, responsible for physical
service, was thus a "servant of servants," serving both
Shem and Japheth, who were also servants. He would provide the
physical means (food, clothing, shelter, weapons, machinery, transportation,
technological inventions, and equipment of all kinds) which would
enable his brothers to carry out their spiritual and mental responsibilities
toward mankind and toward God. In this way, Ham also would be
serving God.
Since, however, Ham would be concerned more directly than the
others with the "ground which the Lord hath cursed"
(Genesis 5:29), the great Curse would be felt more directly by
him than by the others. In this sense, the Hamitic responsibility
was itself a "curse," even though his duties were absolutely
necessary for the accomplishment of God's purposes in mankind.
This prediction by Noah was, of course, a Spirit-inspired prophecy
(not an imprecation born of Noah's resentment), appropriate to
the nature of Ham and his sons, and concerned, as it has shown
itself to be, mainly with physical considerations.
Assuming...that we can identify fairly well the Semitic nations
(Jews, Arabs, Syrians, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, etc.)
and the Japhethic nations (Indo-Europeans), then by process of
elimination all others are Hamitic. The Hamites, in general, have
been largely unconcerned with either science, philosophy, or theology,
and have been occupied largely with material pursuits. They have
often been great inventors and technologists, as well as hard
laborers on farms and hard fighters in battle.
Descendants of Ham included the Egyptians and Sumerians, who
founded the first two great empires of antiquity, as well as other
great nations such as the Phoenicians, Hittites, and Canaanites.
The modern African tribes and the Mongol tribes (including today
the Chinese and Japanese), as well as the American Indians and
the South Sea Islanders, are probably dominantly Hamitic in origin.
Among the many ways in which the Hamites have been the great
"servants" of mankind are the following:
(I) They were the original explorers and settlers of practically
all parts of the world, following the dispersion at Babel.
(2) They were the first cultivators of most of the basic food
staples of the world, such as potatoes, corn, beans, cereals,
and others, as well as the first ones to domesticate most animals.
(3) They developed most of the basic types of structural forms
and building tools and materials.
(4) They were the first to develop most of the usual fabrics
for clothing and the various sewing and weaving devices.
(5) They discovered and invented a wide variety of medicines
and surgical practices and instruments.
(6) They invented most of the concepts of basic practical mathematics,
as well as surveying and navigation.
(7) The machinery of commerce and trade money, banks, postal
systems, and so forth was developed by them.
(8) They developed paper, ink, block printing, movable type,
and other accouterments of writing and communication.
If one traces back far enough, he will find that practically
every other basic device or system needed for man's physical sustenance
or convenience originated with one of the Hamitic peoples! Truly
they have been the "servants" of mankind in a most amazing
way.
Yet the prophecy had an obverse side as well. The Hamites have
usually been able to go only so far with their explorations and
inventions, and no farther. The Japhethites and Semites have,
sooner or later, taken over their territories and their inventions,
and then developed and utilized them to their own advantage in
accomplishing their own "service" to mankind. Sometimes
the Hamites, especially the Negroes, have even become actual slaves
to the others. Possessed of a genetic character concerned mainly
with mundane, practical matters, they have often eventually been
displaced by the intellectual and philosophical acumen of the
Japhethites and the religious zeal of the Semites.
These very general and broad national and racial characteristics
obviously admit of many exceptions on an individual genetic basis.
Furthermore, it is obvious that the prophecy is a divine description
of future facts, in no way needing the deliberate assistance of
the Semites or Japhethites for its accomplishment. Neither Negroes
nor any other Hamitic people is intended to be forcibly subjugated
on the basis of this Noahic declaration. The prophecy would be
fulfilled because of innate genetics and divine leading, not by
virtue of any artificial constraints imposed by man.
Having predicted Ham's primary relationship to the cursed ground,
along with his material responsibilities to mankind, Noah turned
his attention to his next son, Shem. Not only by his action of
filial respect, but apparently also by a character of life closely
observed by his father, Shem had long indicated his love for the
Lord God and his faith in God's promises.
Noah therefore knew that God's spiritual blessings would especially
rest on Shem, and so exclaimed: "Blessed be Jehovah, the
God of Shem!" Shem knew the Lord personally, in his covenant
relationship, and so knew Him by the name Jehovah. This strongly
implies, even though it is not explicitly stated, that it was
through Shem that God's greatest blessing for mankind, the promised
Seed of the woman, would eventually come into the world. Shem
would not be prevented from transmitting God's spiritual blessings
to mankind through future opposition by Canaan and the other sons
of Ham, for indeed Canaan would be his "servant," helping
him to accomplish it.
Finally coming to Japheth, Noah prophesied that Japheth would
be "enlarged" and that the Hamites would also be of
service to him in this function. Pathah, the Hebrew word used
here, is not the usual word for "enlarged" and is so
translated only in this one instance. It apparently does not refer
to a geographical enlargement, for which the Hebrew rachab
would have been suited (actually both Semites and Hamites have
spread geographically as far as the Japhethites).
The word is usually translated "entice" or "persuade."
However, in the particular form in which it occurs in this verse,
it occurs only this once; and translators have been unanimous
in rendering it "be enlarged." It is apparently derived
from the word "to make open" (Hebrew pathach).
It seems most probable, putting all this together, that the
thought here is one of mental enlargement. If one is "persuaded"
or "enticed," his previous opinions have been altered,
he has changed his mind, or "opened" his mind. Japheth
was an open-minded man, and so would be his descendants. The Japhethites
would be intellectually curious, explorers in the world of thought,
as Ham would be in the physical realm and Shem in the spiritual.
Not only would Japheth be intellectually enlarged, but he would
also "dwell in the tents of Shem." This is a common
figure of speech meaning "have fellowship with him."
Thus "dwell in the tents of wickedness" (Psalm 84:10)
means "live in wickedness, out of fellowship with God."
Japheth would not literally live in the same tents (same word
as "tabernacles") with Shem, but he would come to share
in Shem's inheritance that is, his spiritual blessings, which
constituted the essence of Shem's inheritance as prophesied by
Noah. Though Shem would be the means of mankind's receiving God's
great spiritual promises, Japheth also would appropriate these
blessings to himself by enjoying fellowship with Shem. As Shem
and Japheth had unitedly shown respect to their father and their
father's God, so they would unitedly worship "the' Lord God
of Shem." The Hamites, on the other hand, by implication
would not do so, but would presumably follow other gods of their
own devising. Nevertheless, Ham's "service" would contribute
to the purpose of the true God for all men.
Although Noah's threefold prophecy has been abundantly fulfilled
in general and in principle throughout history, it surely allows
for individual exceptions. That is, a particular descendant of
Ham may be very spiritually minded and become a fruitful servant
of the true God. A particular descendant of Japheth may be dull
of mind while skilled in technological devices. A particular Semite
may be an atheist.
In general, however, it has been true throughout history that
the Semites have been dominated by religious motivations centered
in monotheism (the Jews, the Moslems, the Zoroastrians, etc.).
The Japhethites (especially the Greeks, Romans, and later the
other Europeans and the Americans) have stressed science and philosophy
in their development. The Hamites (Egyptians, Phoenicians, Sumerians,
Orientals, Africans, etc.) have been the great pioneers that opened
up the world to settlement, to cultivation, and to technology.
Each stream of nations has influenced the others, of course,
and there has been much mixing of peoples from different tribes
and nations; so there may well be many apparent exceptions to
the general trends. But it is possible to discern these general
trends, and they do follow the prophetic pattern outlined thousands
of years ago by father Noah. The Semites have been predominant
in theology, the Japhethites in science and philosophy, the Hamites
in technology.
Note that these three streams of nations are not three "races."
Though some have thought of the Semites, Japhethites, and Hamites
as three races (say, the dusky, the white, and the black races
or the Mongoloid, Caucasian, and Negroid), this is not what the
Bible teaches, nor is it what modern anthropology and human genetics
teach. There are dusky and black people found among all three
groups of nations. The Bible does not use the word "race"
nor does it acknowledge such a concept. The modern concept of
"race" is based on evolutionary thinking. To the evolutionist,
a race is a subspecies in the process of evolving into a new species,
and this idea is the basis of modern racism..." --Henry M.
Morris, The Genesis Record: A Scientific and Devotional Commentary
on the Book of Beginnings, Creation-Life Publishes, San Diego,
1976.
Family Tree of the Patriarchs of Israel
| |
Noah
Shem
Arphaxad
Cainan
Sala
Eber
Peleg
Ragau
Saruch
Nahor
|
|
Terah
(Genesis 11:27) |
Abraham
|
Nahor |
Haran |
Ishmael
(by Hagar 16:15) |
Isaac
(by Sarah 21:3)
|
Bethuel |
Seven others
(22:20-23) |
Milcah |
Iscah |
Lot
(11:29, 31) |
| |
Esau |
Jacob
|
|
Rebekah |
Laban
(24:29) |
|
Moab |
Ammon
(19:37-38 |
| |
|
|
|
by Leah |
by Rachel |
by Bilhah |
by Zilpah |
| |
Reuben
Simeon
Levi
Judah Issachar Zebulan Dinah |
Joseph |
Benjamin
|
Dan
Naphtali
(30:6-8) |
Gad
Asher
(30:11-13) |
|
| |
Mannesseh Benjamin
(41:51) |
|
NOTES
Noah lived 350 years after the flood and Shem 500 years. The
date of the flood appears to be ~3600-3000 BC based on few gaps
in the family tree leading from the First to the Second Adam.
Barry Setterfield's
Chronology places the Flood date as 3526 BC.
The confusion of tongues at the tower of Babel
occurred not long after the flood, (~100 yrs). The world population
at that time may only have been only 2000-10,000 persons (Henry
Morris, Genesis). The nations then scattered from Babylon.
Continents separated in the time of Peleg, about 150-530 yrs after
the Flood. Possibly, the Ice age followed continental division.
*For a thorough analysis see A. C. Custance, Noah's
Three Sons, Doorway Papers, Zondervan, 1975. Online.
See also After the Flood, by Bill Cooper.
THE MEANING OF THE CHRONOGENEALOGIES
OF GENESIS 5 AND 11, and GENESIS 5 AND 11: CHRONOGENEALOGIES IN THE
BIBLICAL HISTORY OF BEGINNINGS by Gerhard F. Hasel, late
Professor of Old Testament and Biblical Theology, Andrews University.
A good recent article is Table of Nations(Genealogy of Mankind)and the Origin of Races(History of Man) by Tim Osterholm.
The Table of Nations
by Lambert Dolphin
Email: Lambert Dolphin
Website: www.ldolphin.org
|